<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BenBishop.me.uk &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benbishop.me.uk/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benbishop.me.uk</link>
	<description>Please God, just one more bubble...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Microsoft Pulls Out of the Yahoo Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/microsoft/microsoft-pulls-out-of-the-yahoo-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/microsoft/microsoft-pulls-out-of-the-yahoo-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/microsoft/microsoft-pulls-out-of-the-yahoo-acquisition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interestingly Microsoft yesterday announced that they have retracted its acquisiton offer to Yahoo.
From the press release Microsoft&#8217;s CEO, Steve Ballmer states:
&#8220;&#8230;. we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly Microsoft yesterday announced that they have retracted its acquisiton offer to Yahoo.</p>
<p>From the press release Microsoft&#8217;s CEO, Steve Ballmer states:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8230;. we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Microsoft has posted Steve Ballmer&#8217;s letter in full to Yahoo! CEO Jerry Yang online <a title="Microsoft Withdraws Proposal to Acquire Yahoo!" href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/may08/05-03letter.mspx">here</a> and Yahoo responded publicly <a href="http://yhoo.client.shareholder.com/press/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=308131">here</a>, stating:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;From the beginning of this process, our independent board and our management have been steadfast in our belief that Microsoft&#8217;s offer undervalued the company and we are pleased that so many of our shareholders joined us in expressing that view. Yahoo! is profitable, growing, and executing well on its strategic plan to capture the large opportunities in the relatively young online advertising market. Our solid results for the first quarter of 2008 and increased full year 2008 operating cash flow outlook reflect the progress the company is making.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t help feeling that this could be a short sighted mistake on Yahoo&#8217;s part. Yahoo&#8217;s share price will fall now that Microsoft has pulled out and Yahoo will struggle independently against the behemoth that is Google. I think Yahoo realises this and their solidarity has already been diluted with their agreed strategic partnership with Google and Microsoft cites this as one of the reasons (along with the share price) of the withdrawal of the offer.</p>
<p>What will be really interesting is where Microsoft goes from here, their assault on the web in which they trail Google to such an extent, has been dealt a major blow by this. Is there another company that would benefit them to the same extent that the Yahoo acquisition would have? What do you think and is this the end of the matter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/microsoft/microsoft-pulls-out-of-the-yahoo-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to: Get VLC Running in Vista</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/how-to-get-vlc-running-in-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/how-to-get-vlc-running-in-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/software/how-to-get-vlc-running-in-vista/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure whether there is an issue affecting all users of (the excellent) VideoLAN on Vista but it has definitely caused me problems. After installing VLC 0.8.6a on Vista the sound appeared to be fine but no picture was displayed. It seems that this is an issue with the output module in VLC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure whether there is an issue affecting all users of (the excellent) <a title="VideoLAN Web Site" href="http://www.videolan.org/">VideoLAN</a> on Vista but it has definitely caused me problems. After installing VLC 0.8.6a on Vista the sound appeared to be fine but no picture was displayed. It seems that this is an issue with the output module in VLC but can be easily fixed by editing the settings or <em>preferences</em>.</p>
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Go to &#8216;Settings&#8217; -&gt;      &#8216;Preferences&#8217;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Expand the &#8216;Video&#8217; option      and click on &#8216;Output Modules&#8217;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Change the &#8216;Video Output      Module&#8217; from the drop down list to &#8216;DirectX Video Output&#8217;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Expand &#8216;Output Modules&#8217; and      click on &#8216;DirectX&#8217;</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">From the settings that      appear, take the tick out of the &#8216;Use hardware YUV-&gt;RGB conversions&#8217;.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Save your settings and exit.</li>
</ol>
<p><img class="centered" title="Step 3: Change the 'Video Output Module' from the drop down list to 'DirectX Video Output'." src="http://www.benbishop.me.uk/images/vlcsettings.png" alt="Step 3: Change the 'Video Output Module' from the drop down list to 'DirectX Video Output'." width="560" height="360" /></p>
<p><span style="font-style: italic">Step 3 in the process.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/how-to-get-vlc-running-in-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firefox 2 and IE7 &#8211; Not Quite a Browser War</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/firefox-2-and-ie7-not-quite-a-browser-war/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/firefox-2-and-ie7-not-quite-a-browser-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/software/firefox-2-and-ie7-not-quite-a-browser-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks as though it really is the season to be releasing a browser with the recent official release of Internet Explorer 7 (IE7) and the third release candidate of Firefox 2. I can&#8217;t help feeling that the much of the coverage surrounding the releases really boils down to hype with the media and blogsphere [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks as though it really is the season to be releasing a browser with the recent official release of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx">Internet Explorer 7</a> (IE7) and the third release candidate of <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/">Firefox 2</a>. I can&#8217;t help feeling that the much of the coverage surrounding the releases really boils down to hype with the media and blogsphere trying to build this into another <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_Wars">browser war</a>.A &#8216;war&#8217;, &#8216;battle&#8217;, &#8216;face off&#8217; or whatever you want to label it, regardless of who is contesting , requires two fundamental factors; 2 willing contenders.</p>
<p>IE7, while a massive improvement on IE6 with features such as tabbed browsing, RSS integration and improved rendering engine amongst others, it is still not right. Even with all the stink in the web community about the lack of a standards based browser from <em>the</em> major OS developer, IE7 is still some distance from Firefox 2 or even 1.5 for that matter. For all the effort that has been put into IE7 it’s ironic that as we enter a time for major change in the PC world with Vista,  IE7 would have probably been a mostly cosmetic enhancement if it wasn&#8217;t for Firefox. Yet still I get the impression of IE7 being a &#8216;just enough&#8217; browser to appease the majority and keep the web community just far enough from the door. I&#8217;d expect much more to come from Microsoft in future releases.</p>
<p>Firefox is continually evolving though, taking (relatively) small steps each time but each time getting the improvements right; creating a product that is a pleasure to use. The integration and perfection of the session saver add-on (extension) is a perfect example of doing the good things really well.</p>
<p>Battles require a contest and I can&#8217;t help but feel that from Microsoft’s point of view the browser battle is already won and aren&#8217;t really trying. Credit should be given to the IE team for the improvements to IE7 but they still have a long way to go until they are taken seriously by developers and designers and their browser being not being treated with the contempt it currently deserves. There will always be people who want to stray from the conventional but until businesses wake up and see the productivity and usability benefits, Firefox will continue to grow at nowhere near the rate it warrants.</p>
<p>From Mozilla&#8217;s and the privileged end users point of view, Firefox is still quite clearly a number of steps ahead of IE7 and they know this. While the gap between Firefox and IE7 has narrowed, and the competition will eventually benefit Firefox’s user too, I don&#8217;t get the impression the developers and people involved are too concerned about the developments coming from Microsoft at the moment.</p>
<p>A Browser War? A lovers tiff more like. Maybe in the future with the releases of IE8 and FF3 but at the moment this is just the beginning. As the consumer, the real benefit we will receive is an improved browser that many are forced to use in their workplace and the continued polish of an excellent browser in the home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/software/firefox-2-and-ie7-not-quite-a-browser-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To: Add Folders to the Start Menu</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/how-to/how-to-add-folders-to-the-start-menu/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/how-to/how-to-add-folders-to-the-start-menu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/how-to/how-to-add-folders-to-the-start-menu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s a folder in my documents that I regularly access that I wanted listed on my Start Menu. There are other ways of quickly accessing folders or documents such as having quick links on the taskbar or shortcuts on the desktop but the real advantage of this is the keyboard shortcut with the Windows key, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">There’s a folder in my documents that I regularly access that I wanted listed on my Start Menu. There are other ways of quickly accessing folders or documents such as having quick links on the taskbar or shortcuts on the desktop but the real advantage of this is the keyboard shortcut with the Windows key, the first letter of the folder and the return key.</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span lang="EN-GB" /><span lang="EN-GB">Open up regedit from using the      run menu.</span><span lang="EN-GB" /></li>
<li><span lang="EN-GB">Locate &#8216;</span>HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\      Folder\ shellex\ ContextMenuHandlers<span lang="EN-GB">&#8216;</span></li>
<li><span lang="EN-GB" /><span lang="EN-GB">Add the following as a subkey: <strong>&#8216;</strong></span><strong>{a2a9545d-a0c2-42b4-9708-a0b2badd77c8}&#8217;      </strong>(without the quotes!)<span /></li>
<li>Exit regedit&#8230;&#8230; (Continued)&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</li>
</ol>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now, simply hold down the shift key when right clicking on any folder to show the updated context menu. From the menu click the ‘Pin to Start Menu’ option to add to the start menu. In my case I can now do the Windows key and ‘M’ key followed by enter to open the desired folder. This also works with your documents and programs as well.<span lang="EN-GB" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/how-to/how-to-add-folders-to-the-start-menu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 7: Official Beta 2</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/news/internet-explorer-7-official-beta-2/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/news/internet-explorer-7-official-beta-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/news/internet-explorer-7-official-beta-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft yesterday announced the official Beta 2 release of Internet Explorer 7. The previous release was billed as a preview and according to IEBlog they have fixes and changes have been made based on feedback from the previous releases (including CSS). It looks like another couple of releases to come including Beta 3 before the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft yesterday announced the official <a target="_self" href="http://www.microsoft.com/ie">Beta 2</a> release of Internet Explorer 7. The previous release was billed as a preview and according to <a target="_self" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/">IEBlog</a> they have fixes and changes have been made based on feedback from the previous releases (including CSS). It looks like another couple of releases to come including Beta 3 before the official release which is likely to coincide with the official launch of Vista to business around November.</p>
<p>IE7 is a massive improvement on IE6 and really looks as though Microsoft is finally taking the threat of Firefox and the opinions of web developers worldwide seriously at last. Interestingly in addition to IE7&#8217;s continual improvement, Microsoft has gone live with a IE Add-ons <a target="_self" href="http://www.ieaddons.com/">site</a> offering extras for their browsers though I&#8217;d expect most to be written especially for IE7 upon launch. &#8216;Extensions for IE&#8217; anyone!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/news/internet-explorer-7-official-beta-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Run IE7 along side IE6</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/run-ie7-along-side-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/run-ie7-along-side-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/quick/run-ie7-along-side-ie6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest release beta release of IE7 that coincided with MIX06 has, according to Markus Mielke over at IEBlog, now reached &#8216;layout complete&#8217; stage. What this means as, Markus goes on to state, is that we can now start developing websites to be compliant with Microsoft&#8217;s much improved browser. Though still not perfect, Microsoft has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest release beta release of <a target="_self" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie7/ie7betaredirect.mspx">IE7</a> that coincided with MIX06 has, according to Markus Mielke over at <a target="_self" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/03/23/559409.aspx">IEBlog</a>, now reached &#8216;layout complete&#8217; stage. What this means as, Markus goes on to state, is that we can now start developing websites to be compliant with Microsoft&#8217;s much improved browser. Though still not perfect, Microsoft has increased the support for CSS and many of the work arounds previously needed for layout have been fixed. Its still not perfect though and there have been some reports of major websites breaking with this new browser.</p>
<p>So while there is now a period of at least three months to get what minor fixes implemented in new sites and whatever new fixes will be required there is an issue with running IE6 and IE7 on the same machine. IE7&#8217;s beta installs over IE6 which will be fine for the everyday user but for those who want to try it out first or developers who need to test on both browsers the official line has been to run Virtual Machine for this beta browser. </p>
<p>Well short of Microsoft releasing a stand alone IE7, which isn&#8217;t gonna happen, the alternative appears to be a simple batch file that <a target="_self" href="http://weblogs.asp.net/jgalloway/archive/2005/12/28/434132.aspx">Jon Galloway</a> has written. By extracting the IE7 install exe (which is just an self extracting archive) into a directory and creating a batch file the program starts up and functions fully it would seem, without effecting the IE6 installation in anyway. The two programs even seem to function side by side without causing problems. </p>
<p>This does make temporary alterations to the registry though so I would advise backing up before running for the first time in case something goes wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/run-ie7-along-side-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Ipod Parody Video</title>
		<link>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/microsoft-ipod-parody-video/</link>
		<comments>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/microsoft-ipod-parody-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 12:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benbishop.me.uk/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently genuine according to Ipod Observer, this Microsoft Ipod video originated from their own packaging department! It was made for internal purposes and according to Microsoft spokesman Tom Pilla, was intended, &#34;to humorously highlight the challenges we have faced RE: packaging and to educate marketers here about the pitfalls of packaging/branding&#34; 
Whatever the intention, though [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently genuine according to <a target="_self" href="http://www.benbishop.me.uk/wp-admin/Microsoft spokesman Tom Pilla">Ipod Observer</a>, this Microsoft Ipod <a target="_self" href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=36099539665548298&#038;q=microsoft+ipod">video</a> originated from their own packaging department! It was made for internal purposes and according to Microsoft spokesman Tom Pilla, was intended, &quot;to humorously highlight the challenges we have faced RE: packaging and to educate marketers here about the pitfalls of packaging/branding&quot; </p>
<p>Whatever the intention, though clearly tongue in cheek it emphasises the polar difference in branding and design these two rival companies employ. It is well worth checking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benbishop.me.uk/quick/microsoft-ipod-parody-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

